| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |
Molly Roger
   |
Posted - 2011.05.10 21:29:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Molly Roger on 10/05/2011 21:31:32
Ya know, CCP may not want to stir the pot in null for the time being, considering all of null will soon band together to take out the boters and RMTers that has been ignored.
EDIT: Also, many alliances have yet to recover from the last null sec nerf. Considering running L4s in empire is far more profitable for a single pilot now.
|
Molly Roger
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 21:36:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: FellRaven
- Maybe just have spare caps stationed in system?
-Liang
LOL, I will just make another titan and leave it laying around.
|
Molly Roger
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:09:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Molly Roger on 10/05/2011 23:15:27
Edited by: Molly Roger on 10/05/2011 23:10:05
Edited by: Molly Roger on 10/05/2011 23:09:23
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: Zamiq
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: Ay Liz
F
On to the great plan you have. Like others already pointed out, we haven't seen your outline for 0.0 and only see you taking away things that make our lives easier. Maybe you should add something new.. Incentives to live in 0.0 as you called it. Taking away all the good stuff (anomalies, now convenient JB networks) and making our lives miserable until you decide to add something new in 2 years doesn't sound very appealing to anyone.
Won't be two years. You'll hear the early parts of it before this month is up.
Hear being the key word. We wont actual see it for two years if ever. Half your content is either undeveloped or underdeveloped.
Now you're just inventing timeframes. You'll see changes this winter.
We'll be looking at 0.0 this winter. We're hammering down the principles we'll work by as we speak, and they're being reviewed by the CSM. Once they've had their chance to give feedback in person (later this month), I'll happily post the groundwork for everyone to see. From there on, detailed designwork and implementation.
LOL. In a month...no wait...I mean this winter...no wait...i mean we are going to look at it this winter and change something in two years.
Just trollin :)
Now you're just inventing timeframes. You'll see changes this winter.
|
Molly Roger
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:23:00 -
[4]
I haz and idea. Before we encourage more and larger fleet fights...lets fix fleet fight lag!!!!
Yeah I went there. Had problems shooting at targets with 300 in system the other day, neither fleet was a drake blob either so we cant blame missiles.
|
Molly Roger
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:35:00 -
[5]
Quote:
Originally by: Molly RogerI haz and idea. Before we encourage more and larger fleet fights...lets fix fleet fight lag!!!!
Yeah I went there. Had problems shooting at targets with 300 in system the other day, neither fleet was a drake blob either so we cant blame missiles.
U are lame, and your family doesn't know it :)
Yeah I know but someone should have said it.
Quote:
Quote:"The first change is the removal of ships with jumpdrives from the jumpbridge eligibility list. This isnĘt very dramatic and long overdue. Basically if your ship has a jumpdrive, it canĘt use the jumpbridge (Black Ops ships are exempt from this rule). This change will go in on the 17th of this month."
Ok, then let me end my cyno whenever I want without waiting 10 minutes doing nothing.
It's called self destruct.
|
Molly Roger
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:44:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cellistara
They obviously just don't want people in 0.0 to be able to plex accounts, the ratting nerf and increased risk will make actually earning isk less desirable so they make more money.
2 months of eve is $30 US...60 day time code is $35 US. I would think they would encourage plexing accounts so that an extra $5 is made.
|
| |
|